• Login
    Ver ítem 
    •   Inicio Suiiuris revistas
    • España
    • Universidad Carlos III
    • Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional
    • Estudios
    • Ver ítem
    •   Inicio Suiiuris revistas
    • España
    • Universidad Carlos III
    • Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional
    • Estudios
    • Ver ítem
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Recognition in Italy of filiation established abroad by surrogate motherhood, between transnational continuity of personal status and public policy

    Recognition in Italy of filiation established abroad by surrogate motherhood, between transnational continuity of personal status and public policy;
    Il riconoscimento in Italia del rapporto di filiazione costituito all’estero tramite maternita’ surrogata, tra continuita’ dello status e ordine pubblico


    Autor

    Marongiu Buonaiuti, Fabrizio

    Metadata

    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

    Materia

     Status filiationis; surrogate motherhood; public policy; recognition of personal and family status; Art. 8 ECHR; Status filiationis; surrogate motherhood; public policy; recognition of personal and family status; Art. 8 ECHR; rapporto di filiazione; maternità surrogata; ordine pubblico; riconoscimento degli status personali e familiari; Art. 8 CEDU 

    Descripción

    A recent judgment by the Sezioni Unite of the Italian Corte di cassazione has ruled on a highly sensible and controversial issue, concerning the compatibility with the Italian public policy of a foreign court order, establishing a bond of filiation between a child born by surrogacy and the intended father, materially the same sex spouse of the biological father, despite the absence of any genetical link. The Sezioni Unite declared that such a court order could not be recognized, as incompatible with the Italian public policy. In so deciding, they appeared to have taken a step back as compared to an earlier judgment delivered by the first civil chamber of the same Corte di cassazione in 2016, where a more favourable attitude had prevailed. As compared to the said earlier judgment, the Sezioni Unite, besides distinguishing the circumstances occurring in the two cases, provided a more flexible reading of the public policy exception in private international law, partly overruling the narrower reading provided in the earlier judgment, which had limited its scope to those principles concerning the protection of fundamental rights enshrined in international and European instruments, as well as in the Italian Constitution. In the conclusions it reaches, the judgment by the Sezioni Unite reveals a substantial alignment with the solution envisaged by the European Court of Human Rights in its Advisory Opinion of 10 April 2019, contemplating adoption by the intended, non-biological parent, as the avenue by which the right of the child to his private life with that parent might be enforced.
     
    A recent judgment by the Sezioni Unite of the Italian Corte di cassazione has ruled on a highly sensible and controversial issue, concerning the compatibility with the Italian public policy of a foreign court order, establishing a bond of filiation between a child born by surrogacy and the intended father, materially the same sex spouse of the biological father, despite the absence of any genetical link. The Sezioni Unite declared that such a court order could not be recognized, as incompatible with the Italian public policy. In so deciding, they appeared to have taken a step back as compared to an earlier judgment delivered by the first civil chamber of the same Corte di cassazione in 2016, where a more favourable attitude had prevailed. As compared to the said earlier judgment, the Sezioni Unite, besides distinguishing the circumstances occurring in the two cases, provided a more flexible reading of the public policy exception in private international law, partly overruling the narrower reading provided in the earlier judgment, which had limited its scope to those principles concerning the protection of fundamental rights enshrined in international and European instruments, as well as in the Italian Constitution. In the conclusions it reaches, the judgment by the Sezioni Unite reveals a substantial alignment with the solution envisaged by the European Court of Human Rights in its Advisory Opinion of 10 April 2019, contemplating adoption by the intended, non-biological parent, as the avenue by which the right of the child to his private life with that parent might be enforced.
     
    Una recente sentenza delle Sezioni Unite della Corte di cassazione ha affrontato una questione molto delicata e controversa, costituita dalla riconoscibilità in Italia di un provvedimento giurisdizionale straniero costitutivo di un rapporto di filiazione tra un minore e il padre di intenzione – materialmente il coniuge dello stesso sesso del padre biologico – in assenza di alcun legame genetico. Nell’affermare che un tale provvedimento non può essere riconosciuto in quanto in contrasto con l’ordine pubblico, le Sezioni Unite sono parse compiere un passo indietro rispetto a una precedente pronuncia della I sezione civile della stessa Cassazione del 2016, nella quale aveva prevalso un approccio di maggiore apertura. Rispetto a tale precedente pronuncia, le Sezioni Unite, oltre a sottolineare le differenze tra le fattispecie che si presentavano nei due casi, hanno adottato una definizione maggiormente flessibile del limite dell’ordine pubblico nel diritto internazionale privato, del quale la precedente decisione della sezione semplice aveva dato una lettura eccessivamente restrittiva, limitandone la portata a quei soli principi internazionalmente condivisi in materia di tutela dei diritti fondamentali e a quegli ulteriori principi che trovano affermazione nella Costituzione italiana. Nelle conclusioni raggiunte, la pronuncia delle Sezioni Unite rivela un sostanziale allineamento con la posizione assunta dalla Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo nel suo parere consultivo del 10 aprile 2019, facendo riferimento all’adozione del minore da parte del genitore d’intenzione privo di legami biologici, come la via attraverso la quale il diritto del minore alla sua vita privata con tale genitore può ricevere tutela.
     

    URL de acceso al recurso

    https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/CDT/article/view/4959
    10.20318/cdt.2019.4959

    Editor

    Área de Derecho Internacional Privado - Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

    Collections

    • Estudios

    Ítems relacionados

    Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.

    • Draft amendments to the legal status of animals in Brazilian National Congress 

      Braga Lourenço, Daniel
    • For the first time in Canada: Quebec government legislates regarding the legal status of animals 

      Lachance, Martine
    • An Introduction to the Finnish Legal Order and the Legal Status of Nonhuman Animals from a Public Law Point of View 

      Wahlberg, Birgitta
    Powered by 
    Sistema de Biblioteca PUCV

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2024  DuraSpace
    Contacto | Sugerencias
    Sui Iuris
     

     

    Listar

    Todo DSpaceComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

    Mi cuenta

    Acceder
    Powered by 
    Sistema de Biblioteca PUCV

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2024  DuraSpace
    Contacto | Sugerencias
    Sui Iuris